On any given Sunday, a plan that usually appears, not like a poker of aces, but with a certain -albeit spaced frequency, is to go for a walk. But if you decide to stay in the city, the place to go for a walk that brings together family preferences is the shopping center. However, as its name suggests, the commitment of those responsible for each establishment is that the walk of the visitors is not circular, but rather has many stops along its route that allow them to establish personal links with the great variety of goods before becoming the owner of these. As can be deduced, such a scenario is far from being real in all cases. Shopping is one more component within the hierarchy of inspirations that moves a person or a family to travel to spend a few good hours in a shopping center.

In honor of the nature of things, I dare say that the arrangement of spaces and furniture facilitates consumption. Therefore, in the hypothetical case that one decided in advance not to buy, not to spend, the walk would turn into a restless walk or a sort of viewing point of human experiences, as long as one takes a seat (a curb surrounding the tiny gardens).

Comfortably positioned – it is a rhetorical saying – attentive to the dynamics and movements that usually characterize these large conglomerates, one cannot help but be amazed at the unpredictability and singularity of the human being. Even though there is a common route and stimuli, people move with their style: some faster, others slower, some stopping at each shop window, others talking, not a few thinking, etc. The unrepeatable ways of being are expressed, sometimes openly opposed and other times with varied nuances, before the realization of a similar action done by different people. Uniformity, single thought, flags that the progressives of the left hoist, attack the exquisite reality and dignity of the person. Among other reasons, because with the birth of each person the model is exhausted, this condition of unrepeatable is not only corporal, but through his body he manifests the intimate, the personal stored in his spirit, in his heart. Also, because the human being is capable of self-determination, of moving to the right or to the center. Of making this or that decision. By virtue of that great gift that is freedom, man is unpredictable: faced with the same stimulus, he does not have, he does not have the certainty of what type of behavior he will emit. This does not please the governments in power worldwide. The way to reduce the unpredictability of the citizen would not be through the rise of tyrannical governments; it can be achieved in democratic systems. Basically, by replacing the citizen in his most direct responsibilities, the welfare state or populism aim to infantilize its subjects. Conclusion: How much is learned by observing! And the recognition of the nature of things must prevail in the next elections!